We live in extraordinary times, perhaps even too comfortable
Those of us who are not so young, like this writer, will remember well the sacrifices their parents made to buy the family encyclopedia. It helped their children with their schoolwork and, let's face it, it also gave them a certain sense of security: all the world's knowledge, neatly bound and ready for use, in the living room.
I remember the De Agostini GE20, the hours spent among voices, images and links, with its annual updates to buy... Who knows how much money the door-to-door encyclopedia salesmen made in those years...
Today we live in extraordinary times. Access to knowledge is broader, more immediate, and more democratic. We can query artificial intelligence, take online lessons, read articles, watch documentaries, and obtain summaries, translations, and links in seconds.
Have a question? Ask AI. Want to understand a concept? Let it guide you.
Want to know the content of a book, an essay, or a three-hour video, without taking up three hours of your time? Get a summary. Maybe you won't become Pico della Mirandola, but at least you'll know where to start.
All this is wonderful. Especially when you consider that the first personal computer to enter many homes, the VIC-20, had just a few kilobytes of memory and was programmed with a BASIC that was as basic as it was fascinating. Today we expect an AI to summarize Aristotle for us, translate Latin for us, and maybe even recommend what to cook for dinner.
Artificial intelligence is a powerful, useful, and fascinating tool. It can help us understand an ancient text, translate a distant language, contextualize an author, connect ideas, and open doors that until a few years ago were reserved primarily for scholars, specialists, or avid enthusiasts.
Even the web and social media, when they aren't limited to yet another dance routine or slogan-like wisdom, can become valuable tools for storytelling and dissemination. An iconographic detail explained in a post, a miniature recounted in a video, an article on the historical context, a conversation with AI that clarifies a symbol: anything can bring the public closer to collectible manuscripts reproduced in limited editions, art books, antique maps, and works that preserve memory, beauty, and knowledge.
The point, therefore, is not to pit paper against digital, past against future, library against algorithm. That would be a futile battle, not to mention a bit theatrical. Technology can be a great ally of culture: it facilitates discovery, broadens access, and sparks curiosity. It's a bit like what happens with cars; various electronic devices, ADAS, expand the human driver's abilities, improving the driving experience and performance
One crucial difference remains: digital informs, physical objects excite. A book, an antique document, a carefully reproduced manuscript go beyond the transmission of content: they demand to be looked at, touched, treasured. They transform information into experience, curiosity into connection, culture into something that endures, rather than vanishing with a finger on the screen.



